<<

Литература

1. Бурлак С. Происхождение языка: Факты, исследования, гипотезы. М.: Астрель: Корпус, 2011.

2. Ван Еемерен Ф., Хотлоссер П. Аргументация и разумность. О поддержании искусного баланса в стратегическом маневрировании // Мысль.

2006. № 6. С. 7-22.

3. Витгенштейн Л. Философские исследования // Л. Витгенштейн. Философские работы. Ч.1. М.: Гнозис, 1994. С.75-319.

4. Войнрих Х. Лингвистика лжи // Язык и моделирование социального взаимодействия. М.: Прогресс, 1987.

5. Герасимова И.А. Формальная грамматика и интенсиональная логика, М.: ИФ РАН, 2000.

6. Гордон Д., Лакофф Дж. Постулаты речевого общения // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 16. М.: Прогресс, 1985. С. 276-302.

7. Грайс Г.П. Значение говорящего, значение предложения и значение слова // Философия языка / ред. Д. Серль. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2009. С. 75-98.

8. Грайс Г.П. Логика и речевое общение // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике / под ред. Е.В. Падучевой. М.: Прогресс, 1985. Вып. XVI. С. 217-238.

9. Драгалина-Черная Е.Г. Онтологии для Убеляра и Злоизы.М.: Издательский Дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012.

10. Дэвидсон Д. Общение и конвенциональность // Философия, логика, язык / Под ред. Д. П. Горского и В. В. Петрова. М.: Прогресс,

1987. С. 213-233.

11. Касавин И. Т. Принцип милосердия: заслуживает ли доверия субъект познания? // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2013. № 2. С. 5-15.

12. Кибрик А.А. Механизмы устранения референциального конфликта // Моделирование языковой деятельности в интеллектуальных системах /под ред. А.Е. Кибрика и А.С. Нариньяни. М: Наука, 1987. С. 128-145.

13. Ключарев В.А., Шмидс А., Шестакова А.Н. Нейроэкономика: нейробиология принятия решений // Экспериментальная психология. 2011. №. 2. С. 14-35.

14. Лакофф Дж. Прагматика в естественной логике // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 16. М.: Прогресс, 1985. С. 439-470.

15. Лисанюк Е.Н. Полемика и средневековый логический “диспут” // Полемическая культура и структура научного текста в Средние века и раннее Новое время / Отв.

ред. Ю.В. Иванова. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2012. С. 128-156.

16. Лисанюк Е.Н. Принцип кооперации и некооперативные диалоговые игры // Материалы XI Международной конференции «Современная логика: проблемы теории, истории и применения в науке» 24-26 июня 2010 г. / Под ред. И. Б. Микиртумова и др. СПб., 2010. С. 23-25.

17. Макеева Л.Б. Язык, онтология и реализм. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2011.

18. Микиртумов И.Б. Теория смысла и интенсиональная логика. СПб.: СПбГУ, 2006.

19. Микиртумов И.Б. Композициональности и ее прагматика // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2013. № 2. С. 42-58.

20. Монтегю Р. Прагматика // Семантика модальных и интенсиональных логик. М., 1981. С.254-279.

21. Монтегю Р. Прагматика и интенсиональная логика // Семантика модальных и интенсиональных логик. М., 1981. С.223-253.

22. Падучева Е.В. Высказывание и его соотнесенность с действительностью (Референциальные аспекты семантики местоимений). М.: Наука, 1985.

23. Падучева Е.В. Тема языковой коммуникации в сказках Льюиса Кэрролла // Семиотика и информатика.1982. №18. C. 76-119.

24. Печерский С.Л., Беляева А.А. Теория игр для экономистов. Вводный курс. Учебное пособие. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. Ун-та в С.- Петербурге, 2001.

25. Серль Дж. Косвенные речевые акты // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVII. Теория речевых актов. М., 1986. С. 195-222.

26. Скрипник К.Д. Философия. Логика. Диалог. Ростов-на-Дону: Изд. Ростовского университета, 1996.

27. Стросон П. Намерение и конвенция в речевых актах // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 17. М.: Прогресс, 1986.

28. Сусов И.П. Лингвистическая прагматика. Тверь, 2006.

29. Томаселло М. Истоки человеческого общения. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2011.

30. ХинтиккаЯ. Логико-эпистемологические исследования. М.: Прогресс, 1980.

31. Шеллинг Т. Стратегия конфликта. М.: Ирисэн, 2007.

32. Шпербер Д., Уилсон Д. Релевантность // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 23: Когнитивные аспекты языка.

М.: Прогресс,

1988. С. 212-257.

33. Allott N.E. Pragmatics &Rationality: PhD thesis. University College London, 2007.

34. AsherN. Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

35. AsherN., Lascarides A. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

36. Atlas J.D. Logic, Meaning, and Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

37. Attardo S. Locutionary and perlocutionary cooperation: The perlocutionary cooperative principle // Journal of Pragmatics. 1997. Vol.

27, № 6. P. 753-779.

38. Attardo S. Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes // Journal of Pragmatics. 1993. Vol. 19, № 6. P. 537-558.

39. Aumann R. Interactive epistemology I: Knowledge // International Journal of Game Theory. 1999. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 263-300.

40. Aumann R. Interactive Epistemology II: Probability // International Journal of Game Theory. 1999. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 301-314.

41. Aumann R. Rationality and Bounded Rationality // Games and Economic Behavior. 1997. Vol. 21, № 1-2. P. 2-14.

42. Aumann R.J., Brandenburger A. Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium // Econometrica. 2013. Vol. 63, № 5. P. 1161-1180.

43. Bach K. Conversational Implicature // Mind & Language. 1994. Vol. 9. P. 124-162.

44. Bar-Hillel Y. Out of the Pragmatic Wastebasket // Linguistic Inquiry. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 401-407.

45. Benz A. Errors in Pragmatics // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2011. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 97-116.

46. Benz A., van Rooij R. Optimal assertions, and what they implicate. A uniform game theoretic approach // Topoi. 2007. Vol. 26, № 1. P. 63-78.

47. Blome-Tillmann M. Conversational implicature and the cancellability test // Analysis. 2008. Vol. 68, № 2. P. 156-160.

48. Blome-Tillmann M. Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them) // Philosophy Compass. 2013. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 170-185.

49. Borge S. Communication, Cooperation and Conflict // ProtoSociology.

2012. Vol. 29. P. 223-242.

50. Brumark A. Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner table conversation // Journal of Pragmatics. 2006. Vol. 38, № 8. P. 1206­1238.

51. Burton-Roberts N. On Grice and cancellation // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 48, № 1. P. 17-28.

52. Burton-Roberts N. On Horn’s dilemma: presupposition and negation // Journal of Linguistics. 2008. Vol. 25, № 01. P. 95-125.

53. Burton-Roberts N. Presupposition-cancellation and metalinguistic negation: a reply to Carston // Journal of Linguistics. 1999. Vol. 35, № 02. P. 347-364.

54. Camp E. Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction // Nous. 2012. Vol. 46, № 4. P. 587-634.

55. Campbell J. The Liar’s Tale: A History of Falsehood. N.Y.; L.:

W. W. Norton & Company, 2002.

56. Capone A. On Grice’s circle (a theory-internal problem in linguistic theories of the Gricean type) // Journal of Pragmatics. 2006. Vol. 38, № 5. P. 645-669.

57. Carston R. Metalinguistic negation and echoic use // Journal of Pragmatics. 1996. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 309-330.

58. Carston R. Negation, “presupposition” and metarepresentation: a response to Noel Burton-Roberts // Journal of Linguistics. 1999. Vol. 35, № 02. P. 365-389.

59. Carston R., Noh E.J. A truth-functional account of metalinguistic negation, with evidence from Korean // Language Sciences. 1996. Vol. 18. P. 485-504.

60. Cavicchio F., Poesio M. (Non)cooperative Dialogues: The Role of Emotions // Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2012. Vol. 54, № 4. P. 546-559.

61. Chapman S. Paul Grice: Philosopher and Linguist. Basingstoke; NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

62. Chapman S. Some observations on metalinguistic negation // Journal of Linguistics. 2008. Vol. 32, № 02. P. 387-402.

63. ChemlaE., BottL. Processing presuppositions: dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment // Language and Cognitive Processes. 2013. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 241-260.

64. Chilton P. Co-operation and non-co-operation: Ethical and political aspects of pragmatics // Language & Communication. 1987. Vol. 7, № 3. P. 221-239.

65. Clark R. Generalized Quantifiers and Number Sense // Philosophy Compass. 2011. Vol. 6, № 9. P. 611-621.

66. ClarkR. Meaningful Games: Exploring Language with Game Theory. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2012.

67. Clark R., Parikh P. Game theory and discourse anaphora // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2007. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 265-282.

68. Colonna Dahlman R. Conversational Implicatures Are Still Cancellable // Acta Analytica. 2012. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 321-327.

69. Colston H.L. Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism // Discourse Processes. 1997. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 25-45.

70. Colston H.L., O 'Brien J. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better // Journal of Pragmatics. 2000. Vol. 32, № 11. P. 1557-1583.

71. Colston H.L., O 'Brien J. Contrast of Kind Versus Contrast of Magnitude: The Pragmatic Accomplishments of Irony and Hyperbole // Discourse Processes. 2000. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 179-199.

72. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics / ed. Mey J.L. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.

73. Coulmas F. Language and Economy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.

74. Davies B.L. Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and rationality // Journal of Pragmatics. 2007. Vol. 39, № 12. P. 2308-2331.

75. Davies C., Katsos N. Are speakers and listeners “only moderately Gricean”? An empirical response to Engelhardt et al. (2006) // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 49, № 1. P. 78-106.

76. Davis W.A. Communicating, telling, and informing // Philosophical inquiry. 1999. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 21-43.

77. Davis W.A. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

78. Davis W.A. Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

79. Davis W.A. Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference: An Ideational Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

80. de Bruin B. Common knowledge of payoff uncertainty in games // Synthese. 2007. Vol. 163, № 1. P. 79-97.

81. de Bruin B. Common knowledge of rationality in extensive games // Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Vol. 49, № 3. P. 261-280.

82. de Bruin B. Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in Game Theory (Synthese Library). Springer, 2012. P. 200.

83. de Jaegher K. The evolution of Horn’s rule // Journal of Economic Methodology. 2008. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 275-284.

84. Dekker P., van Rooij R. Bi-Directional Optimality Theory: An Application of Game Theory // Journal of Semantics. 2000. Vol. 17, № 3. P. 217-242.

85. Dennis M. et al. Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. // Brain and language.

2001. Vol. 78, № 1. P. 1-16.

86. Doerge F.C., Siebel M. Gricean communication and transmission of thoughts // Erkenntnis. 2008. Vol. 69, № 1. P. 55-67.

87. Douven I. The pragmatics of belief // Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42, № 1. P. 35-47.

88. Dutilh Novaes C. Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.

89. Egorova N., Shtyrov Y., Pulvermuller F. Early and parallel processing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts: neurophysiological evidence // Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013. Vol. 7. P. 86.

90. Ehrenfeucht A. An application of games to the completeness problem for formalized theories // Fundamenta Mathematicae. 1961. № 49. P. 129­141.

91. Engelhardt P., Bailey K., Ferreira F. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? // Journal of Memory and Language. 2006. Vol. 54, № 4. P. 554-573.

92. EngelhardtP.E. Are listeners “fully” Gricean?: A comment on Davies and Katsos (2013) // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 49, № 1. P. 107-113.

93. Experimental Pragmatics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language, and Cognition) / ed. Noveck I.A., Sperber D. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. P. 320.

94. Fitch W.T., Hauser M.D., Chomsky N. The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. // Cognition. 2005. Vol. 97, № 2. P. 179-210.

95. Franke M. et al. Vagueness, Signaling and Bounded Rationality // New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence / eds. T. Onada, D. Bekki,

E. McCready. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.

96. Franke M. Game Theoretic Pragmatics // Philosophy Compass. 2013. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 269-284.

97. Franke M. Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation // Semantics and Pragmatics. 2011. Vol. 4. P. 1-82.

98. Franke M. Signal to Act: Game Theory in Pragmatic: PhD thesis. Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2009.

99. Franke M., de Jager T., van Rooij R. Relevance in Cooperation and Conflict // Journal of Logic and Computation. 2009. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 23­54.

100. Franke M., Jager G. Bidirectional Optimization from Reasoning and Learning in Games // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2011. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 117-139.

101. Franke M., Jager G., van Rooij R. Vagueness, Signaling and Bounded Rationality // New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence / ed. Onada T., Bekki D., McCready E. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. P. 45-59.

102. Fraser B. Perspectives on politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1990. Vol. 14, № 2. P. 219-236.

103. Gabbay D., Woods J. Non-cooperation in dialogue logic // Synthese. 2001. Vol. 127, № 1/2. P. 161-186.

104. Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface) / ed. A.-V. Pietarinen. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007.

105. Game Theory and Pragmatics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language, and Cognition) / eds. A. Benz,

G. Jager, R. van Rooij. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

106. Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science) / eds. O. Majer, A.-V. Pietarinen, T. Tulenheimo. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.

107. Gazdar G. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1978.

108. Geurts B. Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics // Mind & Language. 2009. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 51-79.

109. Gibbs Jr. R. W. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated // Journal of Pragmatics. 2002. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 457­486.

110. Gibbs R. W. Irony in Talk Among Friends // Metaphor and Symbol. 2000. Vol. 15, № 1-2. P. 5-27.

111. Givoni S., Giora R., Bergerbest D. How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 48, № 1. P. 29-40.

112. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. A Model of Persuasion with Boundedly Rational Agents // Journal of Political Economy. 2013. Vol. 120, № 6. P. 1057-1082.

113. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. A study in the pragmatics of persuasion: a game theoretical approach // Theoretical Economics. 2006. Vol. 1, № 4. P. 395-410.

114. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. Debates and decisions: On a rationale of argumentation rules // Games and Economic Behavior. 2001. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 158-173.

115. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. On optimal rules of persuasion // Econometrica. 2004. Vol. 72, № 6. P. 1715-1736.

116. GochetP. The dynamic turn in twentieth century logic // Synthese.

2002. Vol. 130, № 2. P. 175-184.

117. Goodman N.D., Stuhlmuller A. Knowledge and implicature: modeling language understanding as social cognition. // Topics in cognitive science. 2013. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 173-184.

118. Green G.M. The universality of Gricean interpretation // Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 2011. Vol. 16.

P. 411-428.

119. GreenallA.K. Towards a new theory of flouting // Journal of Pragmatics. 2009. Vol. 41, № 11. P. 2295-2311.

120. Grice H.P. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1991. P. 406.

121. Harnish R.M. Logical form and implicature // An integrated theory of linguistic ability / ed. Bever T.G., Katz J.. J., Langendoen D.T. N. Y.: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1976. Vol. 313. P. 313-391.

122. Haugh M. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation // Journal of Pragmatics. 2007. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 84-110.

123. Haugh M. The intuitive basis of implicature: relevance theoretic implicitness versus gricean implying // Pragmatics. International Pragmatics Association, 2002. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 117-134.

124. Hintikka J. Logic of conversation as a logic of dialogue // Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends / ed. Grandy R.E., Warner R. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986. P. 259-276.

125. Hintikka J., Sandu G. Game-Theoretical Semantics // Handbook of logic and language / eds. J. van Benthem, A. terMeulen. L.: Elsevier, 2011. P. 415-465.

126. Horn L.R. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity // Language. 1985. Vol. 61, № 1. P. 121-174.

127. Hugly P., Sayward C. A Problem About Conversational Implicature // Linguistics and Philosophy. 1979. Vol. 3. P. 19-25.

128. Huttegger S.M. Evolution and the Explanation of Meaning // Philosophy of Science. 2007. Vol. 74, № 1. P. 1-27.

129. Jackendoff R., Pinker S. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) // Cognition. 2005. Vol. 97, № 2. P. 211-225.

130. Jager G. Applications of Game Theory in Linguistics // Language and Linguistics Compass. 2008. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 406-421.

131. Jager G., van Rooij R. Language structure: psychological and social constraints // Synthese. 2006. Vol. 159, № 1. P. 99-130.

132. Jager G.. Game-Theoretical Pragmatics // Handbook of Logic and Language / eds. J. van Benthem, A. Ter Meulen. L.: Elsevier, 2011. P. 467-488.

133. Jorgensen J. The functions of sarcastic irony in speech // Journal of Pragmatics. 1996. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 613-634.

134. Karttunen L., Peters S. Conventional Implicature in Montague Grammar // Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1975. P. 266-278.

135. Kasher A. Conversational Maxims and Rationality // Language in focus: Foundations, methods and systems / ed. A. Kasher. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1975. P. 197-216.

136. Katsos N. The semantics/pragmatics interface from an experimental perspective: the case of scalar implicature // Synthese. 2007. Vol. 165, №

3. P. 385-401.

137. Keenan E.O. The universality of conversational postulates // Language in Society. 1976. Vol. 5, № 01. P. 67-80.

138. Kleinke S. Speaker activity and Grice’s maxims of conversation at the interface of Pragmatics and Cognitive Linguistics // Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42, № 12. P. 3345-3366.

139. KomterM.L. Conflict and Cooperation in Job Interviews: A study of talks, tasks and ideas (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991.

140. Kreuz R.J., Long D.L., Church M.B. On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications // Metaphor and Symbolic Activity. 1991. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 149-162.

141. Ladegaard H.J. Pragmatic cooperation revisited: Resistance and non-cooperation as a discursive strategy in asymmetrical discourses // Journal of Pragmatics. 2009. Vol. 41, № 4. P. 649-666.

142. Lakoff R.T. The Logic of Politeness, or, Minding Your P's and Q's // Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, 1973. P. 292-305.

143. Language, Games, and Evolution: Trends in Current Research on Language and Game Theory / eds. A. Benz, C. Ebert , G. Jager , R. van Rooij. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.

144. Lee H.-Κ.Presupposition and implicature under negation // Journal of Pragmatics. 2005. Vol. 37, № 5. P. 595-609.

145. Leech G.N. Principles of Pragmatics. L.: Longman, 1983.

146. Levinson S.C. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA; L.: A Bradford Book, 2000.

147. Lewis D. Convention. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.

148. Lindblom K. Cooperating with Grice: a cross-disciplinary metaperspective on uses of Grice’s cooperative principle // Journal of Pragmatics. 2001. Vol. 33, № 10. P. 1601-1623.

149. Mann A.L., Sandu G., SevensterM. Independence-Friendly Logic: A Game-Theoretic Approach (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

150. Mayol L., Castroviejo E. How to cancel an implicature // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 50, № 1. P. 84-104.

151. McBurney P., Parsons S. Retraction and Revocation in Agent Deliberation Dialogs // Argumentation. 2007. Vol. 21, № 3. P. 269-289.

152. McLaughlinM.L. Conversation: How Talk Is Organized. L.: SAGE Publications, 1984.

153. Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition) / ed. Petrus K. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

154. Meibauer J. Lying and falsely implicating // Journal of Pragmatics.

2005. Vol. 37, № 9. P. 1373-1399.

155. Mooney A. Co-operation, violations and making sense // Journal of Pragmatics. 2004. Vol. 36, № 5. P. 899-920.

156. Norrick N.R. Issues in conversational joking // Journal of Pragmatics.

2003. Vol. 35, № 9. P. 1333-1359.

157. Novaes Dutilh C. Formal Languages in Logic: A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

158. Noveck I.A., Reboul A. Experimental pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language. // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008. Vol. 12, № 11. P. 425-431.

159. Oberlander J. Do the Right Thing ... but Expect the Unexpected // Computational Linguistics. 1998. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 501-507.

160. Optimality Theory and Pragmatics / eds. R. Blutner, H. Zeevat. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

161. Parikh P. A Game-Theoretic Account of Implicature // TARK. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1992. P. 85-94.

162. Parikh P. Communication and strategic inference // Linguistics and Philosophy. 1991. Vol. 14, № 5. P. 473-514.

163. Parikh P. Communication, meaning, and interpretation // Linguistics and Philosophy. 2000. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 185-212.

164. Parikh P. Language and Equilibrium. Cambridge MA; L.: The MIT Press, 2010.

165. Parikh P. Radical Semantics: A New Theory of Meaning // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2005. Vol. 35, № 4. P. 349-391.

166. Partee B.H. The semantics of belief-sentences // Approaches to natural language. 1973. P. 309-336.

167. Peregrin J. The Use-Theory of Meaning and the Rules of Our Language Games // Making Semantics Pragmatic / ed. K. Turner. Bingley: Emerald, 2011. P. 183-204.

168. Pfister J. Is there a need for a maxim of politeness? // Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42, № 5. P. 1266-1282.

169. Pietarinen A.-V. Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science // Foundations of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 317-364.

170. Pietarinen A.-V.A. Semantic Games in Logic and Epistemology // Logic Epistemology and the Unity of Science / ed. Rahman S. et al. Springer Netherlands, 2004. Vol. 1. P. 1075-1076.

171. Pitts A. Exploring a “Pragmatic Ambiguity” of Negation // Language. 2011. Vol. 87, № 2. P. 346-368.

172. Potts C. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

173. Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

174. Radical Pragmatics / ed. P. Cole. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1981.

175. Romoli J. A scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising // Linguistics and Philosophy. 2013. Vol. 36, № 4. P. 291-353.

176. Ros I. Say What? A Game-Theoretic Approach to the Said/Implicated Distinction // Making Semantics Pragmatic / ed.

K. Turner.. Bingley: Emerald, 2011. P. 205-226.

177. Rubinstein A. Economics and Language: Five Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

178. Rubinstein A. Why are certain properties of binary relations relatively more common in natural language? // Econometrica. 1996. Vol. 64, № 2. P. 343-355.

179. Sauerland U., Stateva P. Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

180. Saul J. What Is Said And Psychological Reality; Grice’s Project And Relevance Theorists' Criticisms // Linguistics and Philosophy. 2002. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 347-372.

181. Saul J.M. What Is Said And Psychological Reality; Grice’s Project And Relevance Theorists' Criticisms // Linguistics and Philosophy. 2002. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 347-372.

182. Sbisa M. After Grice: Neo- and Post-perspectives // Journal of Pragmatics. 2006. Vol. 38, № 12. P. 2223-2234.

183. SchoolfieldM.D. Rationality and Conversation: A Thesis on Grice’s Theory of Conversation. The University of Edinburgh, 2007.

184. Sevenster M., Sandu G. Equilibrium semantics of languages of imperfect information // Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 2010. Vol.

161. P. 618-631.

185. Shoham Y., Leyton-Brown K. Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

186. Siegfried T. A Beautiful Math: John Nash, Game Theory, and the Modern Quest for a Code of Nature. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 2006.

187. Skyrms B. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2010.

188. Soames S. Drawing the Line Between Meaning and Implicature-and Relating Both to Assertion // Nous. 2008. Vol. 42, № 3. P. 440-465.

189. Spence M. Job Market Signaling // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1973. Vol. 87, № 3. P. 355-374.

190. Spencer C. Do Conversational Implicatures Explain Substitutivity Failures? // Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 87, № 1. P. 126­139.

191. Sperber D., Wilson D. Irony and the use-mention distinction // Radical pragmatics / ed. Cole P. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1981. P. 295-318.

192. Stalnaker R. Belief revision in games: forward and backward induction // Mathematical Social Sciences. 1998. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 31-56.

193. Stalnaker R. Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

194. Stalnaker R. Extensive and strategic forms: Games and models for games // Research in Economics. 1999. Vol. 53, № 3. P. 293-319.

195. Stalnaker R. Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games // Economics and Philosophy. 2008. Vol. 12, № 02. P. 133-163.

196. StalnakerR. Pragmatics // Synthese. 1970. Vol. 22, № 1-2. P. 272­289.

197. StalnakerR. Semantics for belief // Philosophical Topics. 1987. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 177-190.

198. Talmage C.J.L. Literal meaning, conventional meaning and first meaning // Erkenntnis. 1994. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 213-225.

199. The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

200. TokarzM. Non-axiomatizability of Grice’s implicature // Studia Logica. 1994. Vol. 53, № 2. P. 343-349.

201. van Rooij R., Jager T. Explaining Quantity Implicatures // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2012. Vol. 21, № 4. P. 461-477.

202. van Benthem J. Games in Dynamic-Epistemic Logic // Bulletin of

Economic Research. 2001. Vol. 53, № 4. P. 219-248.

203. van Benthem J. Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

204. van Benthem J., van Rooij R. Connecting the Different Faces of Information // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2003. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 375-379.

205. van Rooij R. Attitudes and Changing Contexts. Dordrecht: Springer,

2006.

206. van Rooij R. Comparing questions and answers: A bit of logic, a bit of language, and some bits of information // Formal Theories of Information. 2009.

207. van Rooij R. Cooperative versus argumentative communication // Philosophia Scientia. 2004. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 195-209.

208. van Rooij R. Evolution of Conventional Meaning and Conversational Principles // Synthese. 2004. Vol. 139, № 2. P. 331-366.

209. van Rooij R. Games and Quantity implicatures // Journal of Economic Methodology. Taylor and Francis Journals, 2008. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 261-274.

210. van Rooij R. Optimality-Theoretic and Game-Theoretic Approaches to Implicature // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature-optimality-games/

211. van Rooij R. Schulz K. Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2004. Vol. 13, №

4. P. 491-519

212. van Rooij R. Strengthening conditional presuppositions // Journal of Semantics. 2007. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 289-304.

213. van Rooij R. Vagueness and Linguistics // Vagueness: A guide / ed. Ronzitti G. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. P. 123-170.

214. van Rooij R., Schulz K. Only: Meaning and implicatures // University of Amsterdam. 2005.

215. van Rooij R., Schulz K. Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation // Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer Netherlands, 2006. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 205-25

216. van Rooij R. Quality and Quantity of Information Exchange // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2003. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 423-451.

217. von. Fintel K. Would you believe it? The King of France is Back // Descriptions and Beyond / eds. M. Reimer, A. Bezuidenhout. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

218. WeinerM. Are all conversational implicatures cancellable? // Analysis. 2006. Vol. 66, № 290. P. 127-130.

219. Wilson D. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? // Lingua. 2006. Vol. 116, № 10. P. 1722-1743.

25 См.: Engelhardt P.E., Bailey K.G.D., Ferreira F. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? // Journal of Memory and Language. 2006.

<< |
Источник: ДОЛГОРУКОВ Виталий Владимирович. ЛОГИКО-ЭПИСТЕМИЧЕСКИЙ СТАТУС ПРАГМАТИЧЕСКИХ ОГРАНИЧЕНИЙ: ТЕОРЕТИКО­ИГРОВОЙ ПОДХОД. ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ на соискание ученой степени кандидата философских наук. Москва - 2014. 2014

Еще по теме Литература:

  1. Литература
  2. Дополнительная литература к Приложению
  3. Библиографический список использованной литературы
  4. Глава 3. Эстетизация воли в художественной литературе
  5. Анализ космологических фрагментов Филолая
  6. СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
  7. ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ
  8. Открытие несоизмеримости как мыслительный феномен
  9. Терминологические и методологические проблемы
  10. ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ
  11. 1.1. Жизнеописание Прокла у античных авторов.
  12. Шопенгауэр: эстетическое безвольное созерцание